Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

COMMISSION FILE NO. 0-26224

 

 

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

 

 

 

DELAWARE   51-0317849

(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF

INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)

 

(I.R.S. EMPLOYER

IDENTIFICATION NO.)

311 ENTERPRISE DRIVE

PLAINSBORO, NEW JERSEY

  08536
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)   (ZIP CODE)

REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (609) 275-0500

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer   x    Accelerated filer   ¨
Non-accelerated filer   ¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding as of April 24, 2012 was 27,015,994.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

INDEX

 

     Page
Number
 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

  

Item 1. Financial Statements

     3   

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited)

     3   

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (Unaudited)

     4   

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March  31, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited)

     5   

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

     6   

Item  2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     19   

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

     28   

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

     29   

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

  

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

     30   

Item 1A. Risk Factors

     30   

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

     30   

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

     30   

Item 6. Exhibits

     31   

SIGNATURES

     32   

EX-3.2

  

EX-10.2

  

EX-31.1

  

EX-31.2

  

EX-32.1

  

EX-32.2

  

EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT

  

EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT

  

EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

  

EX-101 XBRL DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

  

EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT

  

EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

  

 

2


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
     2012     2011  

Total revenue, net

   $ 196,185      $ 181,041   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Costs and expenses:

    

Cost of goods sold

     74,675        64,921   

Research and development

     11,912        12,153   

Selling, general and administrative

     87,411        80,084   

Intangible asset amortization

     4,720        3,011   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total costs and expenses

     178,718        160,169   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income

     17,467        20,872   

Interest income

     378        73   

Interest expense

     (7,929     (5,469

Other income (expense), net

     (323     (643
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

     9,593        14,833   

Provision for income taxes

     2,900        3,346   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

   $ 6,693      $ 11,487   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic net income per share

   $ 0.24      $ 0.39   

Diluted net income per share

   $ 0.23      $ 0.38   

Weighted average common shares outstanding (See Note 13):

    

Basic

     28,345        29,562   

Diluted

     28,488        30,185   

Comprehensive Income

   $ 13,639      $ 25,643   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)

 

     March 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 

ASSETS

    

Current Assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 58,642      $ 100,808   

Short-term investments

     53,780        —     

Trade accounts receivable, net of allowances of $6,691 and $6,978

     113,996        118,129   

Inventories, net

     172,469        171,261   

Deferred tax assets

     36,285        36,155   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     24,571        25,904   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     459,743        452,257   

Property, plant, and equipment, net

     136,770        131,383   

Intangible assets, net

     230,920        237,122   

Goodwill

     295,232        292,980   

Deferred tax assets

     23,125        21,477   

Other assets

     12,580        13,128   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 1,158,370      $ 1,148,347   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

    

Current Liabilities:

    

Accounts payable, trade

   $ 35,580      $ 27,656   

Deferred revenue

     4,027        4,543   

Accrued compensation

     23,194        28,010   

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

     41,785        41,659   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     104,586        101,868   

Long-term borrowings under senior credit facility

     166,875        179,688   

Long-term convertible securities

     356,103        352,576   

Deferred tax liabilities

     5,498        5,726   

Other liabilities

     16,857        15,851   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     649,919        655,709   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

    

Stockholders’ Equity:

    

Preferred Stock; no par value; 15,000 authorized shares; none outstanding

     —          —     

Common stock; $0.01 par value; 60,000 authorized shares; 35,749 and 35,734 issued

     358        357   

Additional paid-in capital

     609,849        607,676   

Treasury stock, at cost; 8,903 and 8,903 shares

     (367,121     (367,121

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):

    

Foreign currency translation adjustment

     351        (6,494

Pension liability adjustment, net of tax

     (135     (131

Unrealized loss on derivatives, net of tax

     (2,363 )     (2,468

Retained earnings

     267,512        260,819   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

     508,451        492,638   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 1,158,370      $ 1,148,347   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
     2012     2011  

OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

    

Net income

   $ 6,693      $ 11,487   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

     12,576        9,958   

Deferred income tax provision (benefit)

     (983     (1,981

Amortization of debt issuance costs

     760        517   

Non-cash interest expense

     3,528        1,634   

Share-based compensation

     2,070        4,034   

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements

     (3     (53

Other

     277        —     

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of business acquisitions:

    

Accounts receivable

     4,800        1,096   

Inventories

     (853     (4,770

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     1,619        2,871   

Other non-current assets

     (152     85   

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities

     2,121        (2,797

Deferred revenue

     (534     (628

Other non-current liabilities

     399        (198
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     32,318        21,255   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

    

Purchases of property and equipment

     (10,412     (5,922

Cash used in business acquisition

     (175     —     

Purchases of short-term investments

     (53,248     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

     (63,835     (5,922
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

    

Repayments under senior credit facility

     (12,813     (41,875

Purchases of treasury stock

     —          (4,320

Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net

     250        1,687   

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements

     3        53   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

     (12,560     (44,455
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

     1,911        4,713   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

     (42,166     (24,409

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

     100,808        128,763   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

   $ 58,642      $ 104,354   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

General

The terms “we,” “our,” “us,” “Company” and “Integra” refer to Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries unless the context suggests otherwise.

In the opinion of management, the March 31, 2012 unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. The December 31, 2011 condensed consolidated balance sheet was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Operating results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Significant estimates affecting amounts reported or disclosed in the consolidated financial statements include allowances for doubtful accounts receivable and sales returns and allowances, net realizable value of inventories, valuation of intangible assets including in-process research and development, amortization periods for acquired intangible assets, discount rates and estimated projected cash flows used to value and test impairments of long-lived assets and goodwill, estimates of projected cash flows and depreciation and amortization periods for long-lived assets, computation of taxes, valuation allowances recorded against deferred tax assets, the valuation of stock-based compensation, valuation of pension assets and liabilities, valuation of derivative instruments, valuation of the equity component of convertible debt instruments, the fair value debt instruments, and loss contingencies. These estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the current circumstances. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Certain amounts from the prior year’s financial statements have been reclassified in order to conform to the current year’s presentation.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

There have been no recently issued accounting standards that have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

2. BUSINESS AND ASSET ACQUISITIONS

ACQUISITIONS

BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

Ascension Orthopedics, Inc.

On September 23, 2011, the Company acquired Ascension Orthopedics, Inc. (“Ascension”) for $66.5 million, which includes amounts paid into escrow, subject to working capital adjustments. Ascension, based in Austin, Texas, develops and distributes a range of implants for the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand, foot and ankle. Management determined the preliminary fair value of net assets acquired during the third quarter of 2011 as follows:

 

     Preliminary
Purchase Price
Allocation
      
     (Dollars in thousands)       

Cash

   $ 627      

Inventory

     12,760      

Accounts receivable

     2,917      

Other current assets

     2,398      

Property, plant and equipment

     4,649      

Other long-term assets

     70      

Deferred tax asset — long term

     12,543      

Intangible assets:

      Wtd. Avg. Life:

Technology

     7,885       10 years

Customer relationships

     5,750       12 years

In-process research and development

     1,739       Indefinite

Supplier relationship

     4,510       10 years

Trade name

     560       1 year

Goodwill

     15,909      
  

 

 

    

Total assets acquired

     72,317      

Accounts payable and other liabilities

     5,827      
  

 

 

    

Net assets acquired

   $ 66,490      
  

 

 

    

Management determined the preliminary fair value of net assets acquired during the third quarter of 2011 and has not yet finalized the working capital adjustment. Measurement period adjustments included above reflected a decrease in the total fair value of inventory acquired and a decrease in the value of long term deferred tax assets acquired which was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2011. The measurement period adjustments were made to reflect facts and circumstances existing as of the acquisition date, and did not result from intervening events subsequent to the acquisition date. These adjustments did not have a significant impact on the Company’s previously reported consolidated financial statements and, therefore, the Company has not retrospectively adjusted those financial statements.

The goodwill recorded in connection with this acquisition is based on (i) expected cost savings, operating synergies and other benefits expected to result from the combined operations, (ii) the value of the going-concern element of Ascension’s existing business (that is, the higher rate of return on the assembled net assets versus if the Company had acquired all of the net assets separately), and (iii) intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition such as Ascension’s assembled workforce. The goodwill acquired will not be deductible for tax purposes.

SeaSpine, Inc.

On May 23, 2011, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of SeaSpine, Inc. (“SeaSpine”) for $89.0 million, subject to indemnification holdbacks currently totaling $7.4 million, which are accrued at December 31, 2011 and certain working capital adjustments. The final working capital adjustment was determined in the first quarter of 2012 and reduced the purchase price by $0.3 million. SeaSpine is based in Vista, California and designs, develops and manufactures spinal fixation products and bone substitute products.

 

     Final Purchase Price
Allocation
      
     (Dollars in thousands)       

Cash

   $ 201      

Inventory

     14,900      

Accounts receivable

     7,608      

Other current assets

     623      

Property, plant and equipment

     9,177      

Deferred tax asset — long term

     302      

Intangible assets:

      Wtd. Avg. Life:

Technology

     3,000       8 years

Customer relationships

     41,200       13 years

Non-compete agreements

     1,900       4 years

Trade name

     300       1 year

Goodwill

     14,572      
  

 

 

    

Total assets acquired

     93,783      

Accounts payable and other liabilities

     5,108      
  

 

 

    

Net assets acquired

   $ 88,675      
  

 

 

    

 

7


Table of Contents

Management determined the preliminary fair value of net assets acquired during the second quarter of 2011 and finalized the working capital adjustment in the first quarter of 2012. Measurement period adjustments included above reflect a decrease in the total fair value of consideration to be transferred pursuant to the final working capital adjustment. These measurement period adjustments were made to reflect facts and circumstances existing as of the acquisition date, and did not result from intervening events subsequent to the acquisition date. This adjustment did not have a significant impact on the Company’s previously reported consolidated financial statements and, therefore, the Company has not retrospectively adjusted those financial statements.

The goodwill recorded in connection with this acquisition is based on (i) expected cost savings, operating synergies and other benefits expected to result from the combined operations, (ii) the value of the going-concern element of SeaSpine’s existing business (that is, the higher rate of return on the assembled net assets versus if the Company had acquired all of the net assets separately), and (iii) intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition such as SeaSpine’s assembled workforce. For tax purposes, the Company is treating the acquisition as an asset acquisition; therefore, the goodwill will be deductible for tax purposes.

Pro Forma Results

The following unaudited pro forma financial information summarizes the results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as if the acquisitions completed by the Company during 2011 had been completed as of January 1, 2010. The pro forma results are based upon certain assumptions and estimates, and they give effect to actual operating results prior to the acquisitions and adjustments to reflect (i) increased interest expense, depreciation expense, intangible asset amortization and fair value inventory step-up, (ii) decreases in certain expenses that will not be recurring in the post-acquisition entity, and (iii) income taxes at a rate consistent with the Company’s statutory rate. No effect has been given to other cost reductions or operating synergies. As a result, these pro forma results do not necessarily represent results that would have occurred if the acquisitions had taken place on the basis assumed above, nor are they indicative of the results of future combined operations.

 

     Three
Months Ended
March 31,
2011 (in
thousands
except per
share
amounts)
 

Total Revenue

   $ 198,409   

Net income

     9,601   

Net income per share

  

Basic

   $ 0.32   

Diluted

     0.32   

3. SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS

The Company’s short-term investments consist entirely of time-deposits held by investment-grade banks. These investments have maturity dates ranging from approximately three months to six months from the original date of purchase.

 

8


Table of Contents

4. INVENTORIES

Inventories, net consisted of the following:

 

     March 31,
2012
     December 31,
2011
 
     (In thousands)  

Finished goods

   $ 108,433       $ 106,972   

Work-in process

     36,811         36,070   

Raw materials

     27,225         28,219   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 172,469       $ 171,261   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

5. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The Company revised its operating segments and reporting segments in connection with the change in the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (who serves as the Company’s chief operating decision maker) effective January 3, 2012. As a result, the Company reassigned the goodwill to these new reportable segments based on the relative-fair-value of the Company’s eight underlying reporting units as of January 1, 2012. The Company estimated the fair value of the business units using a discounted cash flow model. The assumptions supporting the estimated future cash flows of the reporting units, including profit margins, long-term forecasts, discount rates and terminal growth rates, reflects the Company’s best estimates. For seven of the eight reporting units, given the significant excess of their estimated fair value over their carrying value, any future goodwill impairment is not likely. However, at January 1, 2012, the estimated fair value of the U.S. Spine business, which is a component of the U.S. Spine and Other reportable segment, exceeded its book value by approximately 15%. This component has $31.7 million of allocated goodwill. In the event that the estimated fair value declines and no longer exceeds the carrying value of this component, an impairment charge may be recorded to reduce the amount of goodwill associated with this component. Refer to footnote 14 for more information on the change in reportable segments.

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2012 were as follows:

 

     U.S.
Neurosurgery
     U.S.
Instruments
     U.S.
Extremities
     U.S.
Spine
and
Other
     International      Total  
     (In thousands)  

Goodwill, gross

   $ 93,913       $ 57,270       $ 60,544       $ 55,693       $ 25,560       $ 292,980   

Accumulated impairment losses

     —           —           —           —           —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Goodwill at December 31, 2011

     93,913         57,270         60,544         55,693         25,560         292,980   

SeaSpine, Inc. working capital adjustment

     —           —           —           289         —           289   

Foreign currency translation

     —           —           —           —           1,963         1,963   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance, March 31, 2012

   $ 93,913       $ 57,270       $ 60,544       $ 55,982       $ 27,523       $ 295,232   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The Company has adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-08, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other: Testing Goodwill for Impairment, which allows entities to first assess qualitative factors before performing a quantitative assessment of the fair value of a reporting unit. If it is determined on the basis of qualitative factors that the fair value of the reporting unit is more-likely-than-not less than the carrying amount, the existing quantitative impairment test is required — otherwise, no further impairment testing is required. If a quantitative assessment is required, the Company utilizes a discounted cash flow analysis that requires certain assumptions and estimates be made regarding market conditions and its future profitability. The Company performs its assessment of the recoverability of goodwill annually during second quarter and it is based upon a comparison of the carrying value of goodwill for each reporting unit with its estimated fair value.

 

9


Table of Contents

The components of the Company’s identifiable intangible assets were as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

     Weighted
Average
Life
   March 31, 2012      December 31, 2011  
        Cost      Accumulated
Amortization
    Net      Cost      Accumulated
Amortization
    Net  
     (Dollars in thousands)  

Completed technology

   11 years    $ 75,681       $ (33,613   $ 42,068       $ 75,990       $ (32,157   $ 43,833   

Customer relationships

   11 years      147,690         (60,700     86,990         147,230         (57,348     89,882   

Trademarks/brand names

   32 years      33,823         (12,076     21,747         33,669         (10,897     22,772   

Trademarks/brand names

   Indefinite      48,484         —          48,484         48,484         —          48,484   

Supplier relationships

   26 years      33,810         (5,521     28,289         33,810         (5,389     28,421   

All other (1)

   6 years      5,682         (2,340     3,342         11,434         (7,704     3,730   
     

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 
      $ 345,170       $ (114,250   $ 230,920       $ 350,617       $ (113,495   $ 237,122   
     

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, all other included in-process research and development of $1.7 million, which was indefinite lived.

During the first quarter of 2012, the Company recorded impairment charges of $0.1 million in cost of goods sold related to a technology asset whose related products are being discontinued.

During the first quarter of 2011, the Company recorded impairment charges of $0.1 million related to a technology asset whose related products are being discontinued, and $0.1 million related to an associated brand name that will no longer be used as a result of our re-branding strategy. These amounts have been recorded in cost of goods sold and amortization expense, respectively.

Based on quarter-end exchange rates, annual amortization expense is expected to approximate $25.2 million in 2012, $19.0 million in 2013, $18.1 million in 2014, $16.3 million in 2015 and $14.0 million in 2016. Identifiable intangible assets are initially recorded at fair market value at the time of acquisition generally using an income or cost approach.

6. DEBT

Amended and Restated Senior Credit Agreement

On August 10, 2010, the Company entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the “First Amendment) with a syndicate of lending banks and further amended the agreement on June 8, 2011 (the “Second Amendment”, and collectively referred to herein as the “Senior Credit Facility”). The Second Amendment increased the revolving credit component from $450.0 million to $600.0 million and eliminated the $150.0 million term loan component that existed under the First Amendment, allows the Company to further increase the size of the revolving credit component by an aggregate of $200.0 million with additional commitments, provides the Company with decreased borrowing rates and annual commitment fees, and provides more favorable financial covenants. The Second Amendment extended the Senior Credit Facility’s maturity date from August 10, 2015 to June 8, 2016. Both the First Amendment and the Second Amendment are collateralized by substantially all of the assets of the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries, excluding intangible assets. The Senior Credit Facility is subject to various financial and negative covenants and at March 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants.

Borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility bear interest, at the Company’s option, at a rate equal to (i) the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the Senior Credit Facility, which definition has not changed) in effect from time to time plus the applicable rate (ranging from 1.00% to 1.75% under the Second Amendment and from 1.75% to 2.50% under the First Amendment) or (ii) the highest of (x) the weighted average overnight Federal funds rate, as published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, plus 0.5%, (y) the prime lending rate of Bank of America, N.A. or (z) the one-month Eurodollar Rate plus 1.0%. The applicable rates are based on the Company’s consolidated total leverage ratio (defined as the ratio of (a) consolidated funded indebtedness less cash in excess of $40 million that is not subject to any restriction of the use or investment thereof to (b) consolidated EBITDA) at the time of the applicable borrowing.

The Company also pays an annual commitment fee (ranging from 0.15% to 0.3% under the Second Amendment, and from 0.2% to 0.5% under the First Amendment, based on the Company’s consolidated total leverage ratio) on the daily amount by which the revolving credit facility exceeds the outstanding loans and letters of credit under the credit facility.

On August 10, 2010, the Company also entered into an interest rate swap effective December 31, 2010 with an investment grade bank which converts a portion of the Company’s variable interest payments to fixed interest payments (see Note 5, “Derivative Instruments”).

At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, there was $166.9 million and $179.7 million outstanding, respectively, under the Senior Credit Facility at a weighted average interest rate of 2.2% and 2.0%, respectively. At March 31, 2012, there was approximately $433.1 million available for borrowing under the Senior Credit Facility. The fair value of outstanding borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility at March 31, 2012 was approximately $157.5 million which was classified within Level 2 of fair value hierarchy. The Company considers the balance to be long-term in nature based on its current intent and ability to repay the borrowing outside of the next twelve-month period.

 

10


Table of Contents

2016 Convertible Senior Notes

On June 15, 2011, the Company issued $230.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 1.625% Convertible Senior Notes due 2016 (the “2016 Notes”). The 2016 Notes mature on December 15, 2016, and bear interest at a rate of 1.625% per annum payable semi-annually in arrears on December 15 and June 15 of each year. In accordance with the accounting guidance for debt with conversion and other options, the Company accounted for the liability and equity components of the 2016 Notes separately. The portion of the debt proceeds that the Company had classified as equity at the time of the offering, and recognized as a debt discount, was determined based on the fair value of similar debt instruments that do not include a conversion feature and amounted to $43.2 million. The Company is amortizing the debt discount to interest expense using the effective interest method through December 2016. The effective interest rate implicit in the liability component was based on the Company’s estimated non-convertible borrowing rate at the date the 2016 Notes were issued and was 5.6%.

At March 31, 2012, the carrying amount of the liability component of the 2016 Notes was $192.3 million, the remaining unamortized discount was $37.7 million, and the principal amount outstanding was $230.0 million. The fair value of the 2016 Notes at March 31, 2012 was approximately $219.2 million which was classified within Level 2 of fair value hierarchy. At December 31, 2011, the carrying amount of the liability component was $190.6 million, the remaining unamortized discount was $39.4 million, and the principal amount outstanding was $230.0 million.

The 2016 Notes are senior, unsecured obligations of the Company, and are convertible into cash and, if applicable, shares of its common stock based on an initial conversion rate, subject to adjustment of 17.4092 shares per $1,000 principal amount of 2016 Notes (which represents an initial conversion price of approximately $57.44 per share). The Company will satisfy any conversion of the 2016 Notes with cash up to the principal amount of the 2016 Notes pursuant to the net share settlement mechanism set forth in the indenture and, with respect to any excess conversion value, with shares of the Company’s common stock. The 2016 Notes are convertible only in the following circumstances: (1) if the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock exceeds 150% of the conversion price during a period as defined in the indenture; (2) if the average trading price per $1,000 principal amount of the 2016 Notes is less than or equal to 98% of the average conversion value of the 2016 Notes during a period as defined in the indenture; (3) at any time on or after June 15, 2016; or (4) if specified corporate transactions occur. The issue price of the 2016 Notes was equal to their face amount, which is also the amount holders are entitled to receive at maturity if the 2016 Notes are not converted. As of March 31, 2012, none of these conditions existed with respect to the 2016 Notes and as a result, the 2016 Notes are classified as long term.

In connection with the issuance of the 2016 Notes, the Company entered into call transactions and warrant transactions, primarily with affiliates of the initial purchasers of such notes (the “hedge participants”). The initial strike price of the call transaction is approximately $57.44 per share, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments. The initial strike price of the warrant transaction is approximately $70.05 per share, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments.

2012 Senior Convertible Notes

On June 11, 2007, the Company issued $165.0 million aggregate principal amount under its 2012 Notes. The 2012 Notes bear interest at a rate of 2.375% per annum payable semi-annually in arrears on December 1 and June 1 of each year. In accordance with the accounting guidance for debt with conversion and other options, the Company accounted for the liability and equity components of the Notes separately. The portion of the debt proceeds that the Company had classified as equity at the time of the offering, and recognized as a debt discount, was determined based on the fair value of similar debt instruments that did not include a conversion feature and amounted to $30.6 million. The Company is amortizing the debt discount to interest expense using the effective interest method through June 2012. The effective interest rate implicit in the liability component was based on the Company’s estimated non-convertible borrowing rate at the date the 2012 Notes were issued and was 6.8%.

At March 31, 2012, the carrying amount of the liability component was $163.8 million, the remaining unamortized discount was $1.2 million, and the principal amount outstanding was $165.0 million. At December 31, 2011, the carrying amount of the liability component of the 2012 Notes was $162.0 million, the remaining unamortized discount was $3.0 million, and the principal amount outstanding was $165.0 million. The entire carrying amount of the Notes is classified as long-term in the March 31, 2012 balance sheet as the Company has the intent and ability to settle the obligation with long-term borrowings from its Senior Credit Facility. The fair value of the Notes at March 31, 2012 was approximately $165.7 million which was classified within Level 2 of fair value hierarchy.

The 2012 Notes are senior, unsecured obligations of the Company, and are convertible into cash and, if applicable, shares of its common stock based on an initial conversion rate, subject to adjustment of 15.3935 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes for the 2012 Notes (which represents an initial conversion price of approximately $64.96 per share). The Company will satisfy any conversion of the 2012 Notes with cash up to the principal amount of the 2012 Notes pursuant to the net share settlement mechanism set forth in the indenture and, with respect to any excess conversion value, with shares of the Company’s common stock. The 2012

 

11


Table of Contents

Notes are convertible only in the following circumstances: (1) if the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock exceeds 130% of the conversion price during a period as defined in the indenture; (2) if the average trading price per $1,000 principal amount of the 2012 Notes is less than or equal to 97% of the average conversion value of the 2012 Notes during a period as defined in the indenture; (3) at any time on or after December 15, 2011; or (4) if specified corporate transactions occur. The issue price of the 2012 Notes was equal to their face amount, which is also the amount holders are entitled to receive at maturity if the 2012 Notes are not converted.

In connection with the issuance of the 2012 Notes, the Company entered into call transactions and warrant transactions, primarily with affiliates of the initial purchasers of such notes (the “hedge participants”). The total cost of the call transactions to the Company was approximately $30.4 million and the Company received approximately $12.2 million of proceeds from the warrant transactions. The call transactions involve the Company’s purchasing call options from the hedge participants, and the warrant transactions involve the Company’s selling call options to the hedge participants with a higher strike price than the purchased call options.

Convertible Note Interest

The interest expense components of the Company’s convertible notes are as follows:

 

     Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
     2012      2011  
     (In thousands)  

2016 Notes:

     

Amortization of the discount on the liability component

   $ 1,739       $ —     

Cash interest related to the contractual interest coupon

     934         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 2,673       $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

2012 Notes:

     

Amortization of the discount on the liability component

   $ 1,789       $ 1,669   

Cash interest related to the contractual interest coupon

     980         980   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 2,769       $ 2,649   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

7. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

Interest Rate Hedging

The Company’s interest rate risk relates to U.S. dollar denominated variable LIBOR interest rate borrowings. The Company uses an interest rate swap derivative instrument entered into on August 10, 2010 with an effective date of December 31, 2010 to manage its earnings and cash flow exposure to changes in interest rates by converting a portion of its floating-rate debt into fixed-rate debt beginning on December 31, 2010. This interest rate swap expires on August 10, 2015.

The Company designates this derivative instrument as a cash flow hedge. The Company records the effective portion of any change in the fair value of a derivative instrument designated as a cash flow hedge as unrealized gains or losses in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), net of tax, until the hedged item affects earnings, at which point the effective portion of any gain or loss will be reclassified to earnings. If the hedged cash flow does not occur, or if it becomes probable that it will not occur, the Company will reclassify the amount of any gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge to interest expense at that time.

The Company expects that approximately $1.8 million of pre-tax losses recorded as net in AOCI related to the interest rate hedge could be reclassified to earnings within the next twelve months.

Foreign Currency Hedging

From time to time the Company enters into foreign currency hedge contracts intended to protect the U.S. dollar value of certain forecasted foreign currency denominated transactions. The Company records the effective portion of any change in the fair value of foreign currency cash flow hedges in AOCI, net of tax, until the hedged item affects earnings. Once the related hedged item affects earnings, the Company reclassifies the effective portion of any related unrealized gain or loss on the foreign currency cash flow hedge to earnings. If the hedged forecasted transaction does not occur, or if it becomes probable that it will not occur, the Company will reclassify the amount of any gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge to earnings at that time.

 

12


Table of Contents

The success of the Company’s hedging program depends, in part, on forecasts of certain activity denominated in euros. The Company may experience unanticipated currency exchange gains or losses to the extent that there are differences between forecasted and actual activity during periods of currency volatility. In addition, changes in currency exchange rates related to any unhedged transactions may affect its earnings and cash flows.

Counterparty Credit Risk

The Company manages its concentration of counterparty credit risk on its derivative instruments by limiting acceptable counterparties to a group of major financial institutions with investment grade credit ratings, and by actively monitoring their credit ratings and outstanding positions on an ongoing basis. Therefore, the Company considers the credit risk of the counterparties to be low. Furthermore, none of the Company’s derivative transactions is subject to collateral or other security arrangements, and none contains provisions that depend upon the Company’s credit ratings from any credit rating agency.

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

The Company has classified all of its derivative instruments within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because observable inputs are available for substantially the full term of the derivative instruments. The following table summarizes the fair value, notional amounts presented in U.S. dollars, and presentation in the consolidated balance sheet for derivatives designated as hedging instruments as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

     Fair Value as of      Notional Amount as of  

Location on Balance Sheet (1):

   March 31,
2012
     December 31,
2011
     March 31,
2012
     December 31,
2011
 
     (In thousands)  

Derivatives designated as hedges — Assets:

           

Foreign currency forward contracts — Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   $ 173       $ —         $ 8,116       $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

Derivatives designated as hedges — Liabilities:

           

Interest rate swap — Accrued expenses and other current liabilities (2)

   $ 1,821       $ 1,634         

Foreign currency forward contracts — Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

     —           108       $ —         $ 1,597   

Interest rate swap — Other liabilities (2)

     2,314         2,458         
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

Total Derivatives designated as hedges — Liabilities

   $ 4,135       $ 4,200         
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

(1) The Company classifies derivative assets and liabilities as current based on the cash flows expected to be incurred within the following 12 months.
(2) At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the notional amount related to the Company’s sole interest rate swap was $136.9 million and $139.7 million, respectively. In the next twelve months, the Company expects to reduce the notional amount by $13.1 million.

The following presents the effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:

 

     Amount of
Gain
(Loss)
Recognized
in AOCI-
Effective
Portion
    Amount of
Gain (Loss)
Reclassified
from AOCI
Into
Earnings-
Effective
Portion
   

Location in Statements of Operations

     (In thousands)      

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

      

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts

   $ 207      $ —       

Cost of goods sold

Interest rate swap

     (492     (449  

Interest (expense)

  

 

 

   

 

 

   
   $ (285   $ (449  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

      

Interest rate swap

   $ (178   $ (573  

Interest (expense)

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

13


Table of Contents

The Company recognized no gains or losses resulting from ineffectiveness of cash flow hedges during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the gross notional amount of derivative foreign currency forward contracts outstanding that were not designated as hedging instruments was $3.4 million and $3.3 million, respectively. The fair value of these forward contracts at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was less than $0.1 million, respectively, which was recorded in other current assets. The impact on the consolidated statements of operations from derivative instruments not designated as hedges for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was a loss of $0.1 million loss recorded in other income (expense), net. There were no gains or losses related to derivatives not designated as hedging instruments during the three months ended March 31, 2011.

8. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

As of March 31, 2012, the Company had stock options, restricted stock awards, performance stock awards, contract stock awards and restricted stock unit awards outstanding under six plans, the 1996 Incentive Stock Option and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (the “1996 Plan”), the 1998 Stock Option Plan (the “1998 Plan”), the 1999 Stock Option Plan (the “1999 Plan”), the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2000 Plan”), the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2001 Plan”), and the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2003 Plan,” and collectively, the “Plans”). No new awards may be granted under the 1996 Plan, the 1998 Plan, or the 1999 Plan.

Stock options issued under the Plans become exercisable over specified periods, generally within four years from the date of grant for officers, directors and employees, and generally expire six years from the grant date for employees and from six to ten years for directors and certain executive officers. Restricted stock issued under the Plans vest over specified periods, generally three years after the date of grant.

Stock Options

As of March 31, 2012, there was approximately $2.8 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested stock options. These costs are expected to be recognized over the next 2.8 years. There were no stock options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2012. The Company received net proceeds of $1.7 million from stock option exercises for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Awards of Restricted Stock, Performance Stock and Contract Stock

Performance stock awards have performance features associated with them. Performance stock, restricted stock and contract stock awards generally have requisite service periods of three years. The Company expenses the fair value of these awards on a straight-line basis over the vesting period or requisite service period, whichever is shorter. As of March 31, 2012, there were approximately $10.2 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested awards. The Company expects to recognize these costs over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.2 years.

The Company has no formal policy related to the repurchase of shares for the purpose of satisfying stock-based compensation obligations. Independent of these programs, the Company does have a practice of repurchasing shares, from time to time, in the open market.

The Company also maintains an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), which provides eligible employees of the Company with the opportunity to acquire shares of common stock at periodic intervals by means of accumulated payroll deductions. The ESPP is a non-compensatory plan.

 

14


Table of Contents

9. TREASURY STOCK

On October 29, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock for an aggregate purchase price not to exceed $75.0 million through December 31, 2012. Shares may be purchased either in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. As of March 31, 2012, there remained $29.1 million available for share repurchases under this latest authorization. The following table sets forth the Company’s treasury stock activity:

 

     Three Months Ended March 31  
     2012      2011  
     $      # of
Shares
     $      # of
Shares
 
     (In thousands)      (In thousands)  

Shares repurchased in the open market in connection with the Board approved buyback program authorized on October 29, 2010

   $ —           —         $ 4,320         87   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

10. RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS

The Company maintains defined benefit pension plans that cover employees in its manufacturing plants located in Andover, United Kingdom (the “UK Plan”) and Tuttlingen, Germany (the “Germany Plan”). The Company closed the Tuttlingen, Germany plant in December 2005. The Company did not terminate the Germany Plan and the Company remains obligated for the accrued pension benefits related to this plan. The plans cover certain current and former employees.

Effective March 31, 2011, the Company froze the benefits due to the participants of the UK Plan in their entirety. This curtailment resulted in a $0.3 million reduction in the projected benefit obligations which we recorded during the quarter ended March 31, 2011. The Company recorded the entire curtailment gain as an offset to the unrecognized net actuarial loss in accumulated other comprehensive income; therefore, this gain had no impact on the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Net periodic benefit costs for the Company’s defined benefit pension plans included the following amounts:

 

     Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
     2012     2011  
     (In thousands)  

Service cost

   $ 6      $ 26   

Interest cost

     160        165   

Expected return on plan assets

     (144     (146

Recognized net actuarial loss

     —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net period benefit cost

   $ 22      $ 45   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Company made $0.2 million of contributions to its defined benefit pension plans during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011, respectively.

11. INCOME TAXES

The following table provides a summary of the Company’s effective tax rate:

 

     Three Months
Ended
March 31,
 
     2012     2011  

Reported tax rate

     30.2 %     22.6

The Company’s effective income tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 was 30.2% and 22.6%, respectively. Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2012 included a $0.6 million accrual for tax contingencies related to uncertain tax positions in connection with ongoing U.S. Federal tax audits.

The effective tax rate may vary from period to period depending on, among other factors, the geographic and business mix of taxable earnings and losses, tax planning and settlements with the various taxing authorities. The Company considers these factors and others, including its history of generating taxable earnings, in assessing its ability to realize deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis.

While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular matter with the various Federal, State and Foreign Tax Authorities, the Company believes that its reserves reflect the most probable outcome of known tax contingencies. Settlement of any particular issue would usually require the use of cash. Favorable resolution would be recognized as a reduction to the Company’s annual effective tax rate in the year of resolution. The tax reserves are presented in the balance sheet within other liabilities, except for amounts relating to items it expects to pay in the coming year which are classified as current income taxes payable.

The Company expects its effective income tax rate for the full year to be approximately 20.5% as a result of a number of uncertain tax positions expected to reverse in the third quarter of 2012. This estimate could be revised in future quarters as additional information is presented to the Company.

 

15


Table of Contents

12. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Comprehensive income was as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
     2012     2011  
     (In thousands)  

Net income

   $ 6,693      $ 11,487   

Foreign currency translation adjustment

     6,845        13,466   

Unrealized gain on derivatives, net of tax

     105        428   

Pension liability adjustments, net of tax

     (4 )     262   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income

   $ 13,639      $ 25,643   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

13. NET INCOME PER SHARE

Certain of the Company’s unvested restricted share units contain rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends, and thus, are participating securities requiring the two-class method of computing EPS. The participating securities had an insignificant impact (impacts the rounding by less than $0.01 per share) on basic and diluted net income per share for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011; therefore, we do not present the full calculation below.

Basic and diluted net income per share were as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
     2012      2011  
     (In thousands, except
per share amounts)
 

Basic net income per share:

     

Net income

   $ 6,693       $ 11,487   

Weighted average common shares outstanding

     28,345         29,562   

Basic net income per share

   $ 0.24       $ 0.39   

Diluted net income per share:

     

Net income

   $ 6,693       $ 11,487   

Weighted average common shares outstanding — Basic

     28,345         29,562   

Effect of dilutive securities:

     

Stock options and restricted stock

     143         623   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares for diluted earnings per share

     28,488         30,185   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Diluted net income per share

   $ 0.23       $ 0.38   

At March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had 1.7 million and 1.5 million of outstanding stock options, respectively. The Company also has warrants outstanding relating to its 2016 Convertible Senior Notes and 2012 Notes at March 31, 2012 and 2011. Stock options and warrants are included in the diluted earnings per share calculation using the treasury stock method, unless the effect of including the stock options would be anti-dilutive. For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, 1.5 million and 0.2 million anti-dilutive stock options, respectively, were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation. As the strike price of the warrants exceeds the Company’s average stock price for the period, the warrants are anti-dilutive and we excluded the entire number of warrants, the amount of which is based on the Company’s average stock price, from the diluted earnings per share calculation.

 

16


Table of Contents

14. SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

Starting in the first quarter of 2012, due to changes in how the Company internally manages and reports the results of its businesses to its chief operating decision maker, the Company is disclosing five reportable segments and eight operating segments. The five reportable segments are U.S. Neurosurgery, U.S. Instruments, U.S. Extremities, U.S. Spine and Other, and International. The U.S. Neurosurgery segment sells a full line of products specifically for neurosurgery and critical care such as: tissue ablation equipment, dural repair products, cerebral spinal fluid management devices, intracranial monitoring equipment, and cranial stabilization equipment. The U.S. Instruments business sells more than 60,000 instrument patterns and surgical products and lighting to hospitals, surgery centers, and dental, podiatry, and veterinary offices. The U.S. Extremities segment includes the U.S. extremity reconstruction business, which includes such offerings as skin and wound repair, bone and joint fixation, implants in the upper and lower extremities, bone grafts and nerve and tendon repair. The U.S. Spine and Other segment includes (i) the U.S. Spine business, which focuses on spinal fusion, spinal implants, and deformity correction, (ii) the U.S. Orthobiologics business, which focuses on bone graft substitutes, and other related medical devices that are used to enhance the repair and regeneration of bone in various types of orthopedic surgical procedures, and (iii) the Private Label business, which sells the Company’s regenerative medicine and other products to strategic partners. The International segment sells similar products to those discussed above, but are managed through the following geographies: (i) Europe, Middle East and Africa, and (ii) Central/South America, Asia-Pacific and Canada. The Corporate and other category includes (i) various legal, finance, executive, and human resource functions, (ii) brand management, (iii) share based compensation costs, and (iv) costs related to procurement, manufacturing operations and logistics for the Company’s entire organization. Accordingly, the segment information for the prior years has been restated in accordance with authoritative guidance on segment reporting.

The operating results of the various reportable segments as presented are not comparable to one another because (i) certain operating segments are more dependent than others on Corporate for unallocated general and administrative and/or operational manufacturing functions, and (ii) the Company does not allocate certain manufacturing costs and general and administrative costs to the operating segment results.

Net sales and profit by reportable segment for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
     2012     2011  
     (In thousands)  

Segment Net Sales

    

U.S. Neurosurgery

   $ 40,183      $ 38,130   

U.S. Instruments

     37,994        37,553   

U.S. Extremities

     26,587        21,306   

U.S. Spine and Other

     44,810        37,325   

International

     46,611        46,727   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenues

   $ 196,185      $ 181,041   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Segment Profit

    

U.S. Neurosurgery

   $ 21,156      $ 19,157   

U.S. Instruments

     9,183        8,182   

U.S. Extremities

     7,526        5,798   

U.S. Spine and Other

     13,533        12,725   

International

     17,465        17,412   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Segment profit

     68,863        63,274   

Amortization

     (4,720     (3,011

Corporate and other

     (46,676     (39,391
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income

   $ 17,467      $ 20,872   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

17


Table of Contents

Revenue by major product category consisted of the following:

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
     2012      2011  
     (In thousands)  

Orthopedics

   $ 86,152       $ 72,252   

Neurosurgery

     66,057         65,187   

Instruments

     43,976         43,602   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total revenues

   $ 196,185       $ 181,041   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The Company attributes revenues to geographic areas based on the location of the customer. There are certain revenues managed by the various U.S. segments above that are generated from non-U.S. customers and therefore included in Europe and the Rest of World revenues below. Total revenue by major geographic area consisted of the following:

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
     2012      2011  
     (In thousands)  

United States

   $ 148,674       $ 133,300   

Europe

     23,668         25,087   

Rest of World

     23,843         22,654   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total revenues

   $ 196,185       $ 181,041   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In consideration for certain technology, manufacturing, distribution and selling rights and licenses granted to the Company, the Company has agreed to pay royalties on sales of certain products that we sell. The royalty payments that the Company made under these agreements were not significant for any of the periods presented.

The Company is subject to various claims, lawsuits and proceedings in the ordinary course of its business, including claims by current or former employees, distributors and competitors and with respect to its products. In the opinion of management, such claims are either adequately covered by insurance or otherwise indemnified, or are not expected, individually or in the aggregate, to result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition. However, it is possible that these contingencies could materially affect its results of operations, financial position and cash flows in a particular period.

The Company has settled, or has pending against it, various lawsuits, claims and proceedings. The Company accrues for loss contingencies when it is deemed probable that a loss has been incurred and that loss is estimable. The amounts accrued are based on the full amount of the estimated loss before considering insurance proceeds, and do not include an estimate for legal fees expected to be incurred in connection with the loss contingency. The Company consistently accrues legal fees expected to be incurred in connection with loss contingencies as a period cost as outside counsel incurs those fees.

 

18


Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report and our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We have made statements in this report which constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions about the Company. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including but not limited to those set forth above under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

You can identify these forward-looking statements by forward-looking words such as “believe,” “may,” “could,” “will,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “seek,” “plan,” “expect,” “should,” “would” and similar expressions in this report.

GENERAL

Integra is a world leader in medical devices focused on limiting uncertainty for surgeons so they can concentrate on providing the best patient care. Integra provides customers with clinically relevant, innovative and cost-effective products that improve the quality of life for patients. We focus on cranial and spinal procedures, small bone and joint injuries, the repair and reconstruction of soft tissue, and instruments for surgery.

We manage our business through a combination of product groups and geography, and accordingly, we report our financial results under five reportable segments — U.S. Instruments, U.S. Neurosurgery, U.S. Extremities, U.S. Spine and Other (which consists of our U.S. Spine, U.S. Orthobiologics and Private Label businesses) and International.

We present revenues in three product categories: Orthopedics, Neurosurgery and Instruments. Our orthopedics products group includes specialty metal implants for surgery of the extremities, shoulder and spine, orthobiologics products for repair and grafting of bone, dermal regeneration products and tissue-engineered wound dressings and nerve and tendon repair products. Our neurosurgery products group includes, among other things, dural grafts that are indicated for the repair of the dura mater, ultrasonic surgery systems for tissue ablation, cranial stabilization and brain retraction systems, systems for measurement of various brain parameters and devices used to gain access to the cranial cavity and to drain excess cerebrospinal fluid from the ventricles of the brain. Our instruments products group includes a wide range of specialty and general surgical and dental instruments and surgical lighting for sale to hospitals, outpatient surgery centers, and physician, veterinarian and dental practices.

We manufacture many of our products in plants located in the United States, Puerto Rico, France, Germany, Ireland, the United Kingdom and Mexico. We also source most of our handheld surgical instruments and specialty metal implants through specialized third-party vendors.

In the United States, we have several sales channels. Orthopedics products are sold through a large direct sales organization and through specialty distributors focused on their respective surgical specialties. Neurosurgery products are sold through directly employed sales representatives. Instruments products are sold through two sales channels, both directly and through distributors and wholesalers, depending on the customer call point. We sell in the international markets through a combination of a direct sales organization and specialty distributors.

We also market certain products through strategic partners in the United States.

Our objective is to become a diversified global medical device company that helps patients by limiting uncertainty for medical professionals, and to be a high quality investment for shareholders. We will achieve these goals by delivering on our Brand Promises to our customers worldwide and by becoming a top player in all markets in which we compete. Our strategy includes the following key elements: geographic expansion, margin expansion, leveraging platform synergies, disciplined focus and execution, global quality assurance and acquiring or in-licensing products that fit existing sales channels.

 

19


Table of Contents

We aim to achieve growth in our revenues while maintaining strong financial results. While we pay attention to any meaningful trend in our financial results, we pay particular attention to measurements that are indicative of long-term profitable growth. These measurements include (1) revenue growth (derived through acquisitions and products developed internally), (2) gross margins on total revenues, (3) operating margins (which we aim to continually expand as we leverage our existing infrastructure), (4) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, and (5) earnings per diluted share of common stock.

We believe that we are particularly effective in the following aspects of our business:

 

   

Regenerative Medicine Platform. We have developed numerous product lines through our proprietary collagen matrix and demineralized bone matrix technologies that are sold through every one of our sales channels.

 

   

Diversification and Platform Synergies. Each of our three selling platforms contributes a different strength to our core business. Orthopedics enables us to grow our top line and increase marginal gross profit. Neurosurgery provides stable growth as a market with few elective procedures. Instruments has a strong capacity to generate cash flows. We have unique synergies among these platforms, such as our regenerative medicine technology, instrument sourcing capabilities, and Group Purchasing Organization (“GPO”) contract management.

 

   

Unique Sales Footprint. Our sales footprint provides us with a unique set of customer call-points and synergies. Each of our sales channels can benefit from the GPO and Integrated Delivery Network (“IDN”) relationships that our Instruments group manages. We have market leading products among neurosurgeons, many of whom also perform spine surgeries, and we have yet to fully leverage those relationships to sell our spine products. We also have clinical expertise across all of our channels in the United States, and have an opportunity to expand and leverage this expertise in markets worldwide.

 

   

Ability to Change and Adapt. Our corporate culture is truly what enables us to adapt and reinvent ourselves. We have demonstrated that we can quickly and profitably integrate new products and businesses. This core strength has made it possible for us to double our size over the years, and is key to our ability to grow into a multi-billion dollar company.

ACQUISITIONS

We did not complete any acquisitions during the first quarters of 2012 or 2011.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Executive Summary

Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $6.7 million, or $0.23 per diluted share as compared with net income of $11.5 million or $0.38 per diluted share for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

The decrease in net income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 over the same period last year resulted primarily from an increase in (i) cost of goods sold in connection with cost associated with remediation and related unplanned idle time and underutilization at our Plainsboro, New Jersey manufacturing facility and the amortization of inventory at acquisition value, (ii) incremental interest costs from the issuance of our 2016 Notes in June 2011, and (iii) selling, general and administrative costs in connection with the implementation of our global enterprise resource planning system and certain employee terminations, as well as the addition of SeaSpine and Ascension operations.

 

20


Table of Contents

Income before taxes includes the following special charges:

 

     Three Months Ended March 31  
     2012      2011  
     (In thousands)  

SPECIAL CHARGES

     

Plainsboro, New Jersey manufacturing facility remediation costs

   $ 1,635       $ —     

Global ERP implementation charges

     3,669         2,655   

Facility optimization charges

     1,636         1,822   

Certain employee termination charges

     501         34   

Discontinued product lines charges

     835         100   

Acquisition-related charges

     702         942   

Impairment charges

     141         248   

European entity restructuring charges

     —           262   

Convertible debt non-cash interest

     3,528         1,634   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 12,647       $ 7,697   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The items reported above are reflected in the condensed consolidated statements of operations as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     2012      2011  
     (In thousands)  

Cost of goods sold

   $ 4,544       $ 1,435   

Research and development

     —           300   

Selling, general and administrative

     4,575         4,177   

Intangible asset amortization

     —           151   

Interest expense

     3,528         1,634   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 12,647       $ 7,697   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

We typically define special charges as items for which the amounts and/or timing of such expenses may vary significantly from period-to-period, depending upon our acquisition, integration and restructuring activities, and for which the amounts are non-cash in nature, or for which the amounts are not expected to recur at the same magnitude as we implement certain tax planning strategies. We believe that, given our ongoing strategy of seeking acquisitions, our continuing focus on rationalizing our existing manufacturing and distribution infrastructure and our continuing review of various product lines in relation to our current business strategy, certain of the special charges discussed above could recur with similar materiality in the future. In 2010 we began investing significant resources in the global implementation of a single enterprise resource planning system. We began capitalizing certain costs for the project in 2011, and as other aspects of the project reach the application development stage, we will capitalize those expenditures as well.

We believe that the separate identification of these special charges provides important supplemental information to investors regarding financial and business trends relating to our financial condition and results of operations. Investors may find this information useful in assessing comparability of our operating performance from period to period, against the business model objectives established by management, and against other companies in our industry. We provide this information to investors so that they can analyze our operating results in the same way that management does and to use this information in their assessment of our core business and their valuation of Integra.

 

21


Table of Contents

Revenues and Gross Margin

Our revenues and gross margin were as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     2012     2011  
     (In thousands)  

Orthopedics

   $ 86,152      $ 72,252   

Neurosurgery

     66,057        65,187   

Instruments

     43,976        43,602   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenue

     196,185        181,041   

Cost of goods sold

     74,675        64,921   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross margin on total revenues

   $ 121,510      $ 116,120   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross margin as a percentage of total revenues

     61.9     64.1

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
Segment Net Sales:    2012      2011  
     (In thousands)  

U.S. Neurosurgery

   $ 40,183       $ 38,130   

U.S. Instruments

     37,994         37,553   

U.S. Extremities

     26,587         21,306   

U.S. Spine and Other

     44,810         37,325   

International

     46,611         46,727   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total revenues

   $ 196,185       $ 181,041   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 AS COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011

Plainsboro, New Jersey Regenerative Medicine Facility Update

Revenues and gross margin in the quarter were affected by remediation activities in our regenerative medicine facility in Plainsboro, New Jersey. We received a warning letter from the FDA in December, 2011, related to quality systems and compliance issues at that plant. The letter resulted from an inspection held at that facility in August 2011, and did not identify any new observations that were not provided in the Form 483 that followed the inspection. The warning letter does not restrict our ability to manufacture or ship products, nor does it require the recall of any product. Since the conclusion of the inspection, we have undertaken significant efforts to remediate the observations that the FDA has made and continue to do so, including both capital investment for new equipment and leasehold improvements and incremental spending to improve or revise quality systems. We expensed approximately $1.6 million in the first quarter on such initiatives, and anticipate spending another $2.4 million, which includes unplanned idle time and underutilization at the plant, over the remainder of the year. We expect to make capital investments in additional leasehold improvements designed to address the FDA’s observations totaling $2.5 million to $3.0 million over the remainder of the year.

In the first quarter, revenues were affected by shortages of products manufactured in the Plainsboro facility, particularly dermal and wound care products manufactured in our clean room dedicated for such purposes, which resumed production in mid-February after extensive construction and validation. We made substantial progress relieving backorders in such products by the end of March, and anticipate that such backorders will resolve in the second quarter. Expenses incurred in remediation activities also adversely affected gross margin percentage in the first quarter. We do not expect remediation activities in the plant to materially affect backorder levels, but we will suspend production of certain products for limited periods of time and there can be no assurance that we will not incur product shortages that affect revenues in the second quarter.

Revenues and Gross Margin

For the three months ended March 31, 2012, total revenues increased by $15.1 million, or 8%, to $196.2 million from $181.1 million for the same period during 2011. Domestic revenues increased by $15.4 million to $148.7 million, or 76% of total revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 from $133.3 million, or 74% of total revenues, for the three months

 

22


Table of Contents

ended March 31, 2011. International revenues were essentially unchanged compared to the prior year at $47.5 million. Foreign exchange fluctuations, primarily due to a decline in the Euro versus the U.S. dollar, accounted for a $0.6 million decrease in first quarter of 2012 revenues as compared to the same period last year.

U.S. Neurosurgery revenues were $40.2, an increase of 5% from the prior year. Continued demand for our market-leading duraplasty products, as well as strength in our critical care and stereotaxy product lines, drove most of the increase.

U.S. Instruments revenues were $38.0 million, up 1% from the prior year. We have seen modest growth of instruments sales to acute-care facilities and sales of our LED surgical headlamps, which were launched in late 2011, are contributing to the growth. We are still seeing a negative impact from ordering patterns that were interrupted when distributors began purchasing fewer instruments in late 2011 in an effort to reduce their inventories to more desirable levels. We believe that our distributors have largely achieved their lower inventory targets and we expect normal buying patterns to return during the second quarter.

U.S. Extremities revenues were $26.6, an increase of 25% from the prior year. The impact of our Ascension acquisition in the third quarter of 2011 drove most of this increase in revenue as our direct sales force began selling the full line of Ascension’s portfolio of products, moving us away from the legacy distributor network. Significant increases were also noted in dermal and wound care sales, as we began to clear the backorders caused by shortages of our regenerative medicine products that resulted from remediation work in our Plainsboro, New Jersey facility.

The U.S. Spine and Other revenues, which include our spine hardware, orthobiologics and private label products, were $44.8 million, up 20% from the prior year. The increase is primarily because of the addition of SeaSpine’s revenue. While the cross-pollination of the two spine hardware lines is progressing well, the spine hardware market is evolving and remains challenging, both in price and volume. We had another quarter of double-digit growth for orthobiologics. Our EVO3 and Mozaik products continue to see high demand, both from newly added distributors and our core existing distributors. This increase was offset in part by a decrease in our private-label product revenue and royalty revenues.

International segment revenues were $46.6 million which was flat compared to the prior year. The shortages of our regenerative medicine products discussed above were also experienced outside of the United States. That said, we saw increases in the Asia-Pacific and Latin America markets across all product categories. In Europe, we saw decreases in neurosurgery capital spending and extremities purchases; however, these declines were partially offset by our spine and orthobiologics sales which have increased off a relatively small base.

Gross margin increased 5% to $121.5 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012. Gross margin as a percentage of total revenue decreased to 61.9% for the first quarter 2012 from 64.1% for the same period last year. The decrease in gross margin percentage was primarily because of ongoing remediation efforts in our Plainsboro, New Jersey manufacturing facility as discussed above. Also, we discontinued our radiosurgery and radiotherapy product lines and wrote-off the related technology intangible assets and inventory resulting in $1.0 million of incremental costs during the quarter as we continue to optimize our portfolio. Finally, we incurred additional costs related to the amortization of the fair value inventory step-up on the acquired SeaSpine and Ascension inventories from 2011.

In 2012, we expect our consolidated gross margin percentage to be flat to up slightly compared to 2011. We expect to complete the remediation work at our Plainsboro, New Jersey regenerative medicine manufacturing facility and accordingly, expect to return to normal levels of production during 2012. However, higher costs resulting from the amortization of the Ascension and SeaSpine inventory to cost of goods sold at acquisition value, costs related to the expansion of our regenerative medicine activities, and continued downward pressure on our private-label sales volumes will negatively effect our consolidated gross margin.

Other Operating Expenses

The following is a summary of other operating expenses as a percent of total revenues:

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     2012     2011  

Research and development

     6.1      6.7 

Selling, general and administrative

     44.6      44.2 

Intangible asset amortization

     2.4      1.7 

Research and development expenses in the first quarter of 2012 remained flat, compared to the same period last year. We target 2012 spending on research and development to be between 6% and 7% of total revenues. Product development efforts for our spine, and extremity reconstruction product lines, were offset by lower spending in neurosurgery and instrument product development activities partially offset the higher expenses.

 

23


Table of Contents

Selling, general and administrative expenses in the first quarter of 2012 increased by $7.3 million to $87.4 million, compared to $80.1 million in the same period last year. Selling and marketing expenses increased by $6.0 million primarily due to a higher proportion of sales to distributors during the quarter, which inherently have a higher cost than the direct selling model. General and administrative costs increased $1.3 million primarily due to charges related to the implementation of our global enterprise resource planning system. We expect that selling, general and administrative spending for 2012, excluding all special charges to be 41% to 41.5% of revenues.

Amortization expense in the first quarter of 2012 was $4.7 million compared to $3.0 million in the same period last year. The increase is primarily due to amortization of the significant intangible assets added as part of our SeaSpine and Ascension acquisitions that occurred during the second and third quarters of 2011, respectively.

Non-Operating Income and Expenses

The following is a summary of non-operating income and expenses:

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     2012     2011  
     (In thousands)  

Interest income

   $ 378      $ 73   

Interest expense

   $ (7,929   $ (5,469

Other income (expense)

   $ (323   $ (643

Interest Income and Interest Expense

Interest expense in the three months ended March 31, 2012 increased primarily as a result of interest on our 2016 Notes that we entered into in June 2011. The impact of our interest rate swap which had the effect of increasing interest expense by $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Our reported interest expense for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 includes non-cash interest related to the accounting for convertible securities of $3.5 million and $1.7 million, respectively. The increase in interest income came primarily from short-term investments in time deposits held outside the United States.

Other Income (Expense)

Other expense of $0.3 million in 2012 and other expense of $0.6 million in 2011 is primarily attributable to foreign exchange gains and losses on intercompany balances.

Income Taxes

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     2012     2011  
     (In thousands)  

Income before income taxes

   $ 9,593      $ 14,833   

Income tax expense

     2,900        3,346   

Effective tax rate

     30.2      22.6

Our effective income tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 was 30.2% and 22.6%, respectively. Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2012 included a $0.6 million accrual for tax contingencies related to uncertain tax positions, in connection with ongoing U.S. Federal tax audits.

The effective tax rate may vary from period to period depending on, among other factors, the geographic and business mix of taxable earnings and losses, tax planning and settlements with the various taxing authorities. We consider these factors and others, including our history of generating taxable earnings, in assessing its ability to realize deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis.

While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular matter with the various Federal, State and Foreign Tax Authorities, we believe that our reserves reflect the most probable outcome of known tax contingencies. Settlement of any particular issue would usually require the use of cash. Favorable resolution would be recognized as a reduction to our annual rate in the year of resolution. The tax reserves are presented in the balance sheet within other liabilities, except for amounts relating to items we expect to pay in the coming year which are classified as current income taxes payable.

 

24


Table of Contents

We expect our effective income tax rate for the full year to be approximately 20.5% as a result of a number of uncertain tax positions that we expect to reverse in the third quarter of 2012. This estimate could be revised in future quarters as additional information is presented to us.

GEOGRAPHIC PRODUCT REVENUES AND OPERATIONS

We attribute revenues to geographic areas based on the location of the customer. There are certain revenues managed by the various U.S. segments noted above that are made to non-U.S. customers and are therefore included in Europe or Rest of world revenues below – these revenues are not significant. Total revenue by major geographic area consisted of the following:

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     2012      2011  
     (In thousands)  

United States

   $ 148,674       $ 133,300   

Europe

     23,668         25,087   

Rest of world

     23,843         22,654   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total revenues

   $ 196,185       $ 181,041   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

See our discussion of international revenues under the Item 2 section titled Results of Operations – “Revenues and Gross Margins.”

We generate significant revenues outside the United States, a portion of which are U.S. dollar-denominated transactions conducted with customers who generate revenue in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. As a result, currency fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and the currencies in which those customers do business could have an impact on the demand for our products in foreign countries.

Local economic conditions, regulatory compliance or political considerations, the effectiveness of our sales representatives and distributors, local competition and changes in local medical practice all may combine to affect our sales into markets outside the United States.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash and Marketable Securities

We had cash and cash equivalents totaling approximately $58.6 million and $100.8 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. We had short-term investments totaling $53.8 million at March 31, 2012 all of which were held by our non-U.S. subsidiaries. There were no short-term investments at December 31, 2011. At March 31, 2012, our non-U.S. subsidiaries held approximately $44.5 million of cash and cash equivalents that are available for use by all of our operations outside the United States. If these funds or the short-term investments held outside the United States were repatriated to the United States or used for United States operations, certain amounts could be subject to United States tax for the incremental amount in excess of the foreign tax paid.

Cash Flows

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     2012     2011  
     (In thousands)  

Net cash provided by operating activities

   $ 32,318      $ 21,255   

Net cash used in investing activities

     (63,835     (5,922

Net cash used in financing activities

     (12,560     (44,455

Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash

     1,911        4,713   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

   $ (42,166   $ (24,409
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

25


Table of Contents

In 2012, we anticipate that our principal uses of cash will include the repayment of our convertible 2012 Notes of $165 million, of which approximately $134 million will be classified as a financing use of cash for the repayment of the debt component, and approximately $31 million will be classified as an operating use of cash for the repayment of accreted interest. We plan to spend between $65 million and $75 million on capital expenditures primarily for the expansion of regenerative medicine manufacturing capacity, our enterprise resource planning system implementation, and additions to our instrument sets used in sales of orthopedic products.

In addition, our executive chairman holds approximately 1.67 million deferred stock units (“SUs”) accumulated over the past eight years that will be distributed to him in the form of shares of our common stock within approximately six months after the date he ceases to be an employee of the Company and takes the role of the non-executive chairman. The Company would be required to use cash to pay withheld federal and state taxes in connection with the release of such SUs, and most of the payments would be classified as an operating use of cash. Accordingly, if our executive chairman ceases to be an employee before June 30, 2012, the SUs will be distributed and taxes will be withheld in the fourth quarter of 2012. The Company will retain shares equal in value to the required withholding taxes, which may exceed 44% of the then aggregate fair market value of the SUs. The Company will be able to deduct the total amount of such deferred compensation from its federal and state corporation taxes, but will not receive the cash benefits of such deductions in the same period.

Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities

We generated operating cash flows of $32.3 million and $21.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Operating cash flows increased largely due to improved working capital management, especially the collection of accounts receivable in the quarter. Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 plus non-cash items included in those earnings amounted to approximately $24.9 million. Changes in working capital provided $7.2 million of net cash flows. Among the changes in working capital, accounts receivable contributed $4.8 million, prepaid expenses and other current assets contributed another $1.6 million, and liabilities contributed another $1.6 million while inventories used $0.9 million.

Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 plus non-cash items included in those earnings amounted to approximately $25.6 million. Changes in working capital used $4.2 million of net cash flows. Among the changes in working capital, accounts receivable contributed $1.1 million and prepaid expenses and other current assets contributed another $2.9 million, while inventories used $4.8 million, and liabilities used another $3.4 million of cash.

Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities

In the first quarter of 2012 we paid $10.4 million in cash for capital expenditures, most of which was directed to the expansion of our regenerative medicine production capacity and global enterprise system implementation and $0.2 million for a working capital adjustment related to the SeaSpine acquisition. We also invested $53.2 million in short-term time deposit accounts, which are held outside of the United States. We paid $5.9 million in cash for capital expenditures during the quarter ended March 31, 2011.

Cash Flows Used in Financing Activities

Our principal uses of cash for financing activities were repayments of $12.8 million and $41.9 million under our senior credit facility in the quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In addition, we repurchased treasury stock of $4.3 million in the first quarter of 2011 with none in the first quarter of 2012. These amounts were partially offset by net proceeds from the employee stock purchase plan and the tax impact of stock-based compensation for a total of $0.3 million in the first quarter of 2012 and proceeds from stock option exercises and the tax impact of stock-based compensation of $1.7 million in the first quarter of 2011. There were no stock option exercises in the first quarter of 2012.

Working Capital

At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, working capital was $355.2 million and $350.4 million, respectively. The increase in working capital is primarily related to additional cash flows from operations generated during the period.

 

26


Table of Contents

Amended and Restated Senior Credit Agreement

On August 10, 2010, the Company entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the “First Amendment) with a syndicate of lending banks and further amended the agreement on June 8, 2011 (the “Second Amendment”, and collectively referred to herein as the “Senior Credit Facility”). The Second Amendment increased the revolving credit component from $450.0 million to $600.0 million and eliminated the $150.0 million term loan component that existed under the First Amendment, allows the Company to further increase the size of the revolving credit component by an aggregate of $200.0 million with additional commitments, provides the Company with decreased borrowing rates and annual commitment fees, and provides more favorable financial covenants. The Second Amendment extended the Senior Credit Facility’s maturity date from August 10, 2015 to June 8, 2016. Both the First Amendment and the Second Amendment are collateralized by substantially all of the assets of the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries, excluding intangible assets. The Senior Credit Facility is subject to various financial and negative covenants and at March 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants.

Borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility currently bear interest, at the Company’s option, at a rate equal to (i) the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the Senior Credit Facility, which definition has not changed) in effect from time to time plus the applicable rate (ranging from 1.00% to 1.75%) or (ii) the highest of (x) the weighted average overnight Federal funds rate, as published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, plus 0.5%, (y) the prime lending rate of Bank of America, N.A. or (z) the one-month Eurodollar Rate plus 1.0%. The applicable rates are based on the Company’s consolidated total leverage ratio (defined as the ratio of (a) consolidated funded indebtedness less cash in excess of $40 million that is not subject to any restriction of the use or investment thereof to (b) consolidated EBITDA) at the time of the applicable borrowing.

The Company will also pay an annual commitment fee (ranging from 0.15% to 0.3%, based on the Company’s consolidated total leverage ratio) on the daily amount by which the revolving credit facility exceeds the outstanding loans and letters of credit under the credit facility.

We plan to utilize the Senior Credit Facility for working capital, capital expenditures, share repurchases, acquisitions, debt repayments and other general corporate purposes. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, there was $166.9 million and $179.7 million outstanding, respectively, under the revolving credit component of the Senior Credit Facility at a weighted average interest rate of 2.2% and 2.0%, respectively. The Company considers the balance to be long-term in nature based on its current intent and ability to repay the borrowing outside of the next twelve-month period. At March 31, 2012, there was approximately $433.1 million available for borrowing under the Senior Credit Facility.

Convertible Debt and Related Hedging Activities

We pay interest each June 1 and December 1 on our $165.0 million senior convertible notes due June 2012 (“2012 Notes”) at an annual rate of 2.375%, and each June 15 and December 15 on our $230.0 million senior convertible notes due December 2016 (“2016 Notes”) at an annual interest rate of 1.625% (collectively, “the Notes”). The 2012 Notes and 2016 Notes are senior, unsecured obligations of Integra, and are convertible into cash and, if applicable, shares of our common stock based on an initial conversion rate, subject to adjustment, of 15.3935 shares and 17.4092 shares, respectively, per $1,000 principal amount of notes (which represents an initial conversion price of approximately $64.96 per share and $57.44 per share, respectively). We expect to satisfy any conversion of the Notes with cash up to the principal amount pursuant to the net share settlement mechanism set forth in the respective indenture and, with respect to any excess conversion value, with shares of our common stock. The 2012 Notes and 2016 Notes are convertible only in the following circumstances: (1) if the closing sale price of our common stock exceeds 130% and 150%, respectively, of the conversion price during a period as defined in the applicable indenture; (2) if the average trading price per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes is less than or equal to 97% or 98%, respectively, of the average conversion value of the Notes during a period as defined in the applicable indenture; (3) at any time on or after December 15, 2011, or June 15, 2016, respectively; or (4) if specified corporate transactions occur. The issue price of the Notes was equal to their face amounts, which is also the amount holders are entitled to receive at maturity if the Notes are not converted. None of these conditions existed with respect to the Notes; therefore the 2016 Notes are classified as long-term. The 2012 Notes are classified as long-term based on the Company’s intent and ability to settle the obligation with long-term borrowings from its Senior Credit Facility.

The Notes, under the terms of the applicable private placement agreement, are guaranteed fully by Integra LifeSciences Corporation, a subsidiary of Integra. The Notes are Integra’s direct senior unsecured obligations and will rank equal in right of payment to all of our existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness.

In connection with the issuance of the Notes, we entered into call transactions and warrant transactions, primarily with affiliates of the initial purchasers of the Notes (the “hedge participants”). The cost of the call transactions to us was approximately $30.4 million for the 2012 Notes and $42.9 million for the 2016 Notes. We received approximately $12.2 million and $28.5 million of proceeds from the warrant transactions for the 2012 Notes and 2016 Notes, respectively. The call transactions involved our purchasing call options from the hedge participants, and the warrant transactions involved us

 

27


Table of Contents

selling call options to the hedge participants with a higher strike price than the purchased call options. The initial strike price of the call transactions is approximately $64.96 for the 2012 Notes and $57.44 for the 2016 Notes, subject to anti-dilution adjustments substantially similar to those in the Notes. The initial strike price of the warrant transactions is approximately $90.95 for the 2012 Notes and $70.05 for the 2016 Notes, in each case subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments.

We may from time to time seek to retire or purchase a portion of our outstanding Notes through cash purchases and/or exchanges for equity securities, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. Under certain circumstances, the call options associated with any repurchased Notes may terminate early, but only with respect to the number of Notes that cease to be outstanding. The amounts involved may be material.

Share Repurchase Plan

On October 29, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price not to exceed $75.0 million through December 31, 2012. Shares may be purchased either in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. We repurchased no shares under this program during the first three months of 2012 and $29.1 million remains available under the authorization.

Dividend Policy

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since our formation. Our credit facility limits the amount of dividends that we may pay. Any future determinations to pay cash dividends on our common stock will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors.

Capital Resources

We believe that our cash and available borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility are sufficient to finance our operations and capital expenditures, and potential acquisition-related earn-out payments in the near term based on our current plans. See “Amended and Restated Senior Credit Agreement” for a description of the material terms and classification of our credit facility.

OTHER MATTERS

Critical Accounting Estimates

The critical accounting estimates included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 have not materially changed.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

There have been no recently issued accounting standards that have an impact on our financial statements.

 

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to various market risks, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates that could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. To manage the volatility relating to these typical business exposures, we may enter into various derivative transactions when appropriate. We do not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading or other speculative purposes.

Foreign Currency Exchange and Other Rate Risks

We operate on a global basis and are exposed to the risk that changes in foreign currency exchange rates could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We are primarily exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk with respect to transactions and net assets denominated in euros, Swiss francs, British pounds, Canadian dollars, and Australian dollars. We manage the foreign currency exposure centrally, on a combined basis, which allows us to net exposures and to take advantage of any natural offsets. To mitigate the impact of currency fluctuations on transactions denominated in nonfunctional currencies, we periodically enter into derivative financial instruments in the form of foreign currency exchange forward contracts with major financial institutions. We temporarily record realized and unrealized gains and losses on these contracts that qualify as cash flow hedges in other comprehensive income, then recognize them in other income or expense when the hedged item affects net earnings.

 

28


Table of Contents

From time to time, we enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts with terms of up to 12 months to manage currency exposures for transactions denominated in a currency other than an entity’s functional currency. As a result, the impact of foreign currency gains/losses recognized in earnings are partially offset by gains/losses on the related foreign currency forward exchange contracts in the same reporting period.

We maintain written policies and procedures governing our risk management activities. With respect to cash flow hedges, changes in cash flows attributable to hedged transactions are generally expected to be completely offset by changes in the fair value of hedge instruments. Consequently, foreign currency exchange contracts would not subject us to material risk due to exchange rate movements, because gains and losses on these contracts offset gains and losses on the assets, liabilities or transactions being hedged.

The results of operations for the periods discussed herein have not been materially affected by inflation.

Interest Rate Risk

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments. We are exposed to the risk of interest rate fluctuations on the interest income earned on our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. A hypothetical 100 basis point movement in interest rates applicable to our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments outstanding at March 31, 2012 would increase interest income by approximately $1.1 million on an annual basis. We are subject to foreign currency exchange risk with respect to cash balances maintained in foreign currencies.

Senior Credit Facility. Our interest rate risk relates primarily to U.S. dollar LIBOR-indexed borrowings. We have used an interest rate derivative instrument to manage our earnings and cash flow exposure to changes in interest rates by utilizing a forward-starting interest rate swap that began to offset a portion of our interest payments in the first quarter of 2011. This interest rate derivative instrument fixed the interest rate on a portion of our expected LIBOR-indexed floating-rate borrowings beginning on December 31, 2010. The interest rate swap had a notional amount of $136.9 million outstanding as of March 31, 2012. We recognized $0.4 million of additional interest expense related to this derivative during the first quarter of 2012. The fair value of our interest rate derivative instrument was a net liability of $4.1 million at March 31, 2012.

Based on our outstanding borrowings at March 31, 2012, a one-percentage point change in interest rates would have impacted interest expense on the unhedged portion of our debt by $0.3 million on an annualized basis.

 

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Management has designed our disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

As required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b), we have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2012. Based upon this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2012 to provide such reasonable assurance.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

29


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are subject to various claims, lawsuits and proceedings in the ordinary course of our business, including claims by current or former employees, distributors and competitors and with respect to our products. In the opinion of management, such claims are either adequately covered by insurance or otherwise indemnified, or are not expected, individually or in the aggregate, to result in a material adverse effect on our financial condition. However, it is possible that our results of operations, financial position and cash flows in a particular period could be materially affected by these contingencies.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The Risk Factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 have not materially changed.

 

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

In October 2010, our Board of Directors adopted a program that authorizes us to repurchase shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price not to exceed $75.0 million through December 31, 2012. Shares may be repurchased either in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions.

There were no purchases of our common stock under this program during the quarter ended March 31, 2012.

 

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable

 

30


Table of Contents
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

 

       3.2

   Amended and Restated Bylaws of Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, effective as of May 17, 2012 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2012)

     10.1

   Compensation of Non-Employee Directors of Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2012)

   *10.2

   Termination of Amendment to Lease Contract, dated as of April 2, 2012, between Integra CI, Inc. and Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company

     10.3

   Letter dated February 22, 2012 from John B. Henneman, III to Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 22, 2012)

     10.4

   Severance Agreement between Judith O’Grady and the Company dated as of January 3, 2012 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16(c) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011)

   *31.1

   Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

   *31.2

   Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

   *32.1

   Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

   *32.2

   Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

* +101.INS

   XBRL Instance Document

* +101.SCH

   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

* +101.CAL

   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

* +101.DEF

   XBRL Definition Linkbase Document

* +101.LAB

   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document

* +101.PRE

   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

* Filed herewith
+ The financial information of Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 filed on April 26, 2012 formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) Parenthetical Data to the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, is furnished electronically herewith.

 

31


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS

CORPORATION

Date: April 26, 2012  

/s/ Peter J. Arduini

  Peter J. Arduini
  President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: April 26, 2012  

/s/ John B. Henneman, III

  John B. Henneman, III
 

Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration,

and Chief Financial Officer

 

32


Table of Contents

Exhibits

 

       3.2

   Amended and Restated Bylaws of Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, effective as of May 17, 2012 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2012)

     10.1

   Compensation of Non-Employee Directors of Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2012)

   *10.2

   Termination of Amendment to Lease Contract, dated as of April 2, 2012, between Integra CI, Inc. and Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company

     10.3

   Letter dated February 22, 2012 from John B. Henneman, III to Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 22, 2012)

     10.4

   Severance Agreement between Judith O’Grady and the Company dated as of January 3, 2012 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16(c) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011)

   *31.1

   Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

   *31.2

   Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

   *32.1

   Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

   *32.2

   Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

* +101.INS

   XBRL Instance Document

* +101.SCH

   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

* +101.CAL

   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

* +101.DEF

   XBRL Definition Linkbase Document

* +101.LAB

   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document

* +101.PRE

   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

* Filed herewith
+ The financial information of Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 filed on April 26, 2012 formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) Parenthetical Data to the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, is furnished electronically herewith.

 

33

Termination of Amendment to Lease Contract

Exhibit 10.2

TERMINATION OF AMENDMENT TO LEASE CONTRACT

This Termination of Amendment to Lease Contract (“Termination Contract”) is made as of February 28, 2012, between The Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company, a public corporation organized and existing by virtue of Act No. 188 of May 11, 1942, as amended, (the “Landlord”), and Integra CI, Inc., formerly known as Integra Neurosciences P.R., Inc., a Cayman Islands company (the “Tenant”).

WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant are parties to a certain Lease Agreement dated April 11, 2003 which was amended on October 24, 2005, amended and restated by a Lease Contract dated April 1, 2005 (registered by the Landlord on September 15, 2006), and amended by an Amendment to Lease Contract dated as of November 2, 2011 (the “Amendment.”) Pursuant to the provisions of the Amendment, the Landlord leased to the Tenant, and the Tenant rented from the Landlord, the Additional Premises, identified as Project No. S-1212-0-77-00.

WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant desire to terminate the Amendment executed for the Additional Premises.

 

  1. The Amendment is hereby terminated effective as of the date of this Termination Contract.

 

  2. Landlord and Tenant agree that any notice requirements and any fees or penalties for termination of the Lease are hereby waived.

 

  3. Landlord acknowledges that Tenant requested the Amendment Termination; nevertheless, Landlord hereby releases Tenant from any further responsibility, obligation or liability under the Amendment, considering that Tenant did not receive the leased premises.

 

  4. Landlord has not inspected the premises.


  5. Landlord agrees to return the $46,109.92 ($15.235.45 Cash Receipt No. 170974- January 28, 2010 and $30,874.47 Cash Receipt No. 174805- November 16, 2011) representing the security deposit balance of this Termination of Amendment to Lease Contract.

 

  6. Except as otherwise provided in this Termination of Amendment to Lease Contract, terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have executed, or caused to be executed, this Termination of Lease Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

 

LANDLORD:     TENANT:
PUERTO RICO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,     INTEGRA CI, INC.,
By:  

/s/ Armando Bustillo

    By:  

/s/ Peter J. Arduini

Name:  

Armando Bustillo

    Name:  

Peter J. Arduini

Title:  

Director

    Title:  

President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  

3/26/12

    Date:  

4/2/12

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Peter J. Arduini, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13 a-15(e): and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

 

  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

  (b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: April 26, 2012  

/s/ Peter J. Arduini

  Peter J. Arduini
  President and Chief Executive Officer
Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John B. Henneman, III, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13 a-15(e): and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

 

  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

  (b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: April 26, 2012  

/s/ John B. Henneman, III

  John B. Henneman, III
  Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration, and Chief Financial Officer
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Peter J. Arduini, President and Chief Executive Officer and Director of Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to my knowledge:

 

1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: April 26, 2012  

/s/ Peter J. Arduini

  Peter J. Arduini
  President and Chief Executive Officer
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906

Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John B. Henneman, III, Executive Vice President Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to my knowledge:

 

1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: April 26, 2012  

/s/ John B. Henneman, III

  John B. Henneman, III
  Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration, and Chief Financial Officer